London based law Firm
Case Studies

Public Law Case Studies

Back to Case Studies
Public Law

Case Studies

R (D) v. Bromley IAP [2007] EWCA Civ 1010

Natural justice in school exclusion appeals

(AS) Sri Lanka v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWHC 1763 Admin

Intensity of judicial review over human rights claims

Jennings v. HMRC [2010] UKFTT 49

Meaning of ‘dwelling’ for the purposes of Value Added Tax Act 1994 Sch.8 Group 5 Note 13 and its relationship with s.35 of the Act

Indigo Services (UK) Ltd v. Colchester Institute [2010] EWHC 3237 (QB)

First UK case under regulation 47H of the Public Contracts Regulations, considering the appropriate test for applications to lift the automatic stay on signing an awarded public contract

West County Vending Services Ltd v. HMRC [2010] UKFTT 124

Whether VAT chargeable on food supplies ‘on the premises’: meaning of ‘premises’ for VAT purposes

R (P) v. Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) [2010] EWHC 1408 Admin

Acting for the Claimant in his successful challenge to the local authority’s decisions concerning his post-16 education

Macaw Properties Ltd v. HMRC [2012] UKFTT 167

Application of the Rompelman principle to finding business purposes. Case concerned the intention to convert the largest country house in England into a luxury hotel and whether expenditure incurred for preparatory acts were exempt from VAT

R (Tilianu) Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] 4 All ER 174 Court of Appeal:

Whether self-employed persons retain a right to reside under EU law for the purposes of claiming job seekers allowance

Huhtala v. HMRC [2011] STC 2226 & [2012] UKFTT 79 (TC)

Whether expenses associated with a house boat used for researching and writing a book were ‘wholly and exclusively’ incurred for the purposes of trade

SS (Sri Lanka) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 76 Court of Appeal:

Whether Upper Tribunal had erred in law by rejecting evidence of persecution

R (Rogerson) v. Secretary of State for Defence [2012] EWHC (Admin)

Meaning of ”relevant change of circumstances” in war pensions legislation

R (M and W) v. Hounslow London Borough Council [2013] EWHC 579 (Admin)

Meaning of ‘home’ for the purposes of a local authority’s home to school transport duties

Oxford Diocesan Board of Finance v. Wokingham Borough Council [2013] EWHC 802 (Admin)

Failure of decision-maker to consider guidance and challenge to strategic environmental assessment

R (Payne and Cooper) v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2012] 2 WLR 1 Supreme Court:

Test cases concerning the lawfulness of deductions from social security benefits after a Debt Relief Order is obtained

Why Choose Us

Our Direct Access Barristers

Enquire Today

Multifaceted & Interdisciplinary

Our barristers in London are cross qualified so you don’t have to go from one solicitor’s office on the High Street to barristers’ chambers at the Inns of Court.

Excellent Value

A barrister usually has lower overheads, so this will usually be more economical than retaining the solicitor alone and will cost less than instructing both.

Maximum Efficiency

You get the earliest possible direct access to the specialist – not just when a problem gets to Court. This could save you the headache, heartache and expense of avoidable litigation.

Full Transparency

You will normally know in advance the basis upon which the work will be charged, as well as your advisors view on likely prospects of success.

Make an Enquiry

Contact our Barristers Today

Call Us
Make an Enquiry